Gratuity: A Contextual Understanding of Tipping Norms from the Perspective of Tipped Employees
Gratuity is based on interviews with 425 people in more than 50 occupational categories. The respondents from across the U.S. reflect the diversity of the population but have one thing in common: they earn tips. A tip is a price set almost entirely by a customer, less connected to demand than to social code. In the U.S., tipping remains one of our most controversial, confusing, and highly variable norms. In their own words, respondents present their perspectives regarding their compensation as well as what they like and dislike about work. Understanding what people think about tipping and how tipped employees experience their work provides an understanding of tipping norms that has never been addressed. The evidence in this study indicates that tips do not appear to increase in accordance with inequality, and tips do not alleviate the discomfort of inequality from the perspective of the tipped employee when they are given to demonstrate status over another. Tips may in some cases serve a redistributive function, but they are not consistent with regard to social status. The evidence in this study also indicates that tips are a weak signal of quality and are not likely to serve as an effective monitoring mechanism. People appear to conform to tipping norms for social and emotional rather than strictly rational reasons. Furthermore, conformity to tipping norms is likewise inconsistent across work contexts. One of the principal mechanisms for fostering conformity lies within the organizational hierarchy, and management plays a critical role. The definitive difference between those who like their job and those who do not is the experience with people, particularly management. Every person who interacts with the public encounters people who are rude or disrespectful. The critical lesson for management is that the emotional costs of these interactions can be mitigated by managers who extend trust and support to employees. The absence of trust in the workplace contributes to a work environment that imposes additional, unnecessary costs on employees and likely affects the experiences of customers.
1100300654
Gratuity: A Contextual Understanding of Tipping Norms from the Perspective of Tipped Employees
Gratuity is based on interviews with 425 people in more than 50 occupational categories. The respondents from across the U.S. reflect the diversity of the population but have one thing in common: they earn tips. A tip is a price set almost entirely by a customer, less connected to demand than to social code. In the U.S., tipping remains one of our most controversial, confusing, and highly variable norms. In their own words, respondents present their perspectives regarding their compensation as well as what they like and dislike about work. Understanding what people think about tipping and how tipped employees experience their work provides an understanding of tipping norms that has never been addressed. The evidence in this study indicates that tips do not appear to increase in accordance with inequality, and tips do not alleviate the discomfort of inequality from the perspective of the tipped employee when they are given to demonstrate status over another. Tips may in some cases serve a redistributive function, but they are not consistent with regard to social status. The evidence in this study also indicates that tips are a weak signal of quality and are not likely to serve as an effective monitoring mechanism. People appear to conform to tipping norms for social and emotional rather than strictly rational reasons. Furthermore, conformity to tipping norms is likewise inconsistent across work contexts. One of the principal mechanisms for fostering conformity lies within the organizational hierarchy, and management plays a critical role. The definitive difference between those who like their job and those who do not is the experience with people, particularly management. Every person who interacts with the public encounters people who are rude or disrespectful. The critical lesson for management is that the emotional costs of these interactions can be mitigated by managers who extend trust and support to employees. The absence of trust in the workplace contributes to a work environment that imposes additional, unnecessary costs on employees and likely affects the experiences of customers.
40.5 In Stock
Gratuity: A Contextual Understanding of Tipping Norms from the Perspective of Tipped Employees

Gratuity: A Contextual Understanding of Tipping Norms from the Perspective of Tipped Employees

Gratuity: A Contextual Understanding of Tipping Norms from the Perspective of Tipped Employees

Gratuity: A Contextual Understanding of Tipping Norms from the Perspective of Tipped Employees

eBook

$40.50 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

Gratuity is based on interviews with 425 people in more than 50 occupational categories. The respondents from across the U.S. reflect the diversity of the population but have one thing in common: they earn tips. A tip is a price set almost entirely by a customer, less connected to demand than to social code. In the U.S., tipping remains one of our most controversial, confusing, and highly variable norms. In their own words, respondents present their perspectives regarding their compensation as well as what they like and dislike about work. Understanding what people think about tipping and how tipped employees experience their work provides an understanding of tipping norms that has never been addressed. The evidence in this study indicates that tips do not appear to increase in accordance with inequality, and tips do not alleviate the discomfort of inequality from the perspective of the tipped employee when they are given to demonstrate status over another. Tips may in some cases serve a redistributive function, but they are not consistent with regard to social status. The evidence in this study also indicates that tips are a weak signal of quality and are not likely to serve as an effective monitoring mechanism. People appear to conform to tipping norms for social and emotional rather than strictly rational reasons. Furthermore, conformity to tipping norms is likewise inconsistent across work contexts. One of the principal mechanisms for fostering conformity lies within the organizational hierarchy, and management plays a critical role. The definitive difference between those who like their job and those who do not is the experience with people, particularly management. Every person who interacts with the public encounters people who are rude or disrespectful. The critical lesson for management is that the emotional costs of these interactions can be mitigated by managers who extend trust and support to employees. The absence of trust in the workplace contributes to a work environment that imposes additional, unnecessary costs on employees and likely affects the experiences of customers.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780739144244
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication date: 06/02/2010
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 310
File size: 344 KB

About the Author

Richard Seltzer is professor of political science at Howard University. Holona LeAnne Ochs is assistant professor of political science at Lehigh University.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Preface by Richard Seltzer
Chapter 2 Introduction
Chapter 3 Theory
Chapter 4 Methodology
Part 5 Section I: Restaurants
Chapter 6 Chapter 1: Restaurant Chains
Chapter 7 Chapter 2: Family Eateries
Chapter 8 Chapter 3: Upscale Dining
Chapter 9 Chapter 4: Bussers and Runners
Chapter 10 Chapter 5: Bartenders, Cocktail Servers, and Bar-Backs
Chapter 11 Chapter 6: Multi-Function Staff
Chapter 12 Chapter 7: Specialty Jobs
Chapter 13 Chapter 8: Tip Jars
Part 14 Section II: Services
Chapter 15 Chapter 9: Household Services
Chapter 16 Chapter 10: Deliveries
Chapter 17 Chapter 11: Loading and Carting
Chapter 18 Chapter 12: Cars
Chapter 19 Chapter 13: Animals
Chapter 20 Chapter 14: Cosmetology
Chapter 21 Chapter 15: Teachers
Chapter 22 Chapter 16: Blue Collar Workers
Chapter 23 Chapter 17: Officiants
Chapter 24 Chapter 18: Medical Care
Chapter 25 Chapter 19: Miscellaneous
Part 26 Section III: Entertainment
Chapter 27 Chapter 20: Family Entertainment
Chapter 28 Chapter 21: Adult Entertainment
Chapter 29 Chapter 22: Musicians
Chapter 30 Chapter 23: Sports
Chapter 31 Chapter 24: Ushers and Vendors
Chapter 32 Conclusion
Chapter 33 References
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews