Commentaries on the criminal law

by Joel Prentiss Bishop

Overview

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.

Product Details

BN ID:	2940016835563
Publisher:	Boston, Little, Brown, and company
Format:	eBook
File size:	2 MB

Read an Excerpt

CHAPTER VI. BLASPHEMY AND PROFANENESS.1 § 73-75. Introduction. 76-78. Blasphemy. 79. Profaneness. 80-84. Doctrines common to both. § 73. Soope of this Chapter. The two common-law offences of blasphemy and profaneness differ only in this, that blasphemy is the word of larger meaning embracing more than the other. And our statutes do not much distinguish between them. Therefore it is deemed best to treat of the two together, in one chapter. § 74. Indictable Why. We have seen,2 that these offences are indictable at the common law. Whether the principle which makes them so is, that they tend to undermine Christianity, which in a certain sense is a part of our common law,8 or that they disturb the peace and corrupt the morals of the community,4 or whether these two principles combine to impart the indictable quality, is a question on which opinions appear not to be quite in harmony. The true view probably is, that, in this instance as in many others, the legal doctrine may be deemed equally to result from any one of several causes; as, from either of the two above mentioned, or from the consideration that reverence toward God and religion Christianity being our form of religion is essential to man, who is injured in his nature and being when it is impaired; or, still another, that these offences so shock his purer and higher sensibilities as to create an injury to him against which he needs protection, precisely as against an assault.6 i For matter relating to this title, see v. Ruggles, 8 Johns. 290, Kent, C. J., ob- Tol. I. § 498. For the pleading, practice, served : " The people of this State, in and evidence, see Crim. Proced. II. § 123 common with thepeople of this country, et seq. And see Stat. Crimes, § 560. profess the general doctrines of Ch...