Geometry at Work: Papers in Applied Geometry

Geometry at Work: Papers in Applied Geometry

ISBN-10:
0883851644
ISBN-13:
9780883851647
Pub. Date:
01/28/2000
Publisher:
Mathematical Association of America
ISBN-10:
0883851644
ISBN-13:
9780883851647
Pub. Date:
01/28/2000
Publisher:
Mathematical Association of America
Geometry at Work: Papers in Applied Geometry

Geometry at Work: Papers in Applied Geometry

Paperback

$28.95
Current price is , Original price is $28.95. You
$28.95 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Temporarily Out of Stock Online
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

  • SHIP THIS ITEM

    Temporarily Out of Stock Online

    Please check back later for updated availability.


Overview

Beginning with art and architecture and culminating with science and mathematics itself, this book discusses geometric ideas and their many applications throughout history. These range from ancient to modern, concrete to abstract, and familiar to cutting edge. Each chapter is written by a leading expert or pioneer in their own field, and the book should be a valuable resource for students and teachers of geometry alike.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780883851647
Publisher: Mathematical Association of America
Publication date: 01/28/2000
Series: Notes Series
Edition description: CAS & BOOK
Pages: 208
Product dimensions: 8.50(w) x 10.90(h) x 0.40(d)

Table of Contents

1. Geometry at work in art and architecture K. Williams, P. Calter and J. Kappraff; 2. Geometry at work in Vedic civilization D. W. Henderson and J. F. Price; 3. Geometry at work in the classroom M. Ascher and M. V. Pokrovskaya; 4. Geometry at work in engineering J. Casey, R. Shahidi, B. Servatius, G. Nagy and B. Mishra; 5. Geometry at work in decision-making processes D. G. Saari, K. P. Bennett and E. J. Bredensteiner; 6. Geometry at work in mathematics and science A. Boerkoel, C. Radin, L. H. Kauffman, T. Pisanski, M. Randic, T. Burger and P. Gritzmann.

Introduction


There is no branch of mathematics, however abstract, that will not eventually be applied to the phenomena of the real world.
-N.I. Lobachevsky
 
 Geometry is the study of shape and form, with origins in surveying land, designing buildings, and measuring volumes. More importantly, geometry is a point of view that sees the shapes and forms that are intrinsic to any mathematical concept or relationship. Indeed, almost every area of mathematics incorporates geometric concepts and the geometric viewpoint in a fundamental way. For example, Descartes used analytic geometry to display the lines and curves associated with algebraic equations. A differential equation has inherent within its formulation a geometric phase space. When confronted with a new group, and algebraist might view it in terms of the symmetries of a higher-dimensional polyhedron to better understand its structure. Binary relations can be understood in terms of trees, and even probability has its foundation in the properties of measure spaces.
 Today, geometry encompasses many different approaches, techniques, and theories, including Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries, projective geometry, finite geometries, transformational geometry, computational geometry, differential geometry, discrete geometry, tilings, and knot theory. The papers in this collection show that the geometric point of view, in all its many different varieties, has many diverse applications going far beyond its origins in measuring distances, areas, and volumes.
 Euclidean geometry, which has dominated the development of Western geometry, uses compass and straightedge to study the flat plane or three-dimensional space. We see the influence of Euclidean geometry in many of the papers in this collection. It is used in the field of art in papers by Kim Williams and Jay Kappraff and we see it used by the engineer as a vital tool for design and communication in the paper by Marina Pokrovskaya. Both Ramin Shahidi and Paul Calter show that measuring distances with Euclidean geometry continues to find new applications.
 Non-Euclidean geometry takes the view that the intrinsic shape of space need not be flat but may be curved. Many of the shapes in our environment are curved, and Jim casey shows how the engineer can make use of Riemannian geometry to understand these curved shapes.
 Analytic geometry integrates algebra and geometry, and it has allowed the geometer to make use of the powerful tools of algebra. Papers by Thomas Burger and Peter Gritzmann, Kristin Bennett and Erin Bredensteiner, Ton Boerkoel, Bud Mishra, and Don Saari demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating algebraic formulations with the study of geometric information.
 Recent research in geometry has focused on invariants and other properties subtler than those of measurement. This work includes tilings, knot theory discrete geometry, computational geometry, and graph theory. Applications of these approaches can be found in the papers by Lou Kauffman, Charles Radin, George Nagy, Brigitte Servatius, and Tomaz Pisanski and Milan Randic.
 Finally, cultures different from our own have seen geometry quite differently. In papers by Marcia Ascher, Jay Kappraff, John Price, and David Henderson we see that our own understanding of geometry can be used to analyze the work of other cultures and to bridge what gaps there may be in time or space between these cultures and ourselves.
 That papers in this collection, written by pioneers and leading experts in their fields, are a valuable resource for geometry teacher and student alike. All of the papers are accessible to anyone having a college-level course in geometry and it is hoped that they will provide a broad vision of applied geometry-geometry at work.

1 The nature of Applications of Knowledge
Some have the attitude that knowledge exists for its own sake, that applications need not be of concern to the mathematician, and in fact may not even be possible for some areas of mathematics. G.H. Hardy espoused the view that number theory, which he considered to be the most beautiful and profound area of mathematics had not the "slightest 'practical' importance." The comment by N.I. Lobachevsky, one of the founders of non-Euclidean geometry, given at the beginning of this introduction, takes quite a different stance. History has proved Hardy wrong-today the very mathematics he cited as an example of the unproductive is the heart of the widely used RSA cryptosystem. Lobachevsky, on the other hand, displayed remarkable prescience, since the revolutionary geometry that he discovered, opposed to the contemporary view of space and originally viewed as unnatural and invalid, turned out to be precisely the viewpoint needed by Albert Einstein in his general theory of relativity. Similarly, many new ideas and discoveries in mathematics and science have eventually proven to have more useful application despite unpromising beginnings. For this reason, it is worthwhile to understand how the theoretical knowledge of mathematics can have real-world applications.
 Although in all disciplines the general processes of gaining and applying knowledge are similar, there are significant differences between mathematics and the sciences which can serve to highlight the unique role of mathematics in applying knowledge generally and in the types of applications we see here. In the sciences, physical phenomena are the objects of study, while in mathematics, the objects of study are purely intellectual concepts and constructs. The real number line, for example is purely conceptual, having no physical existence itself. In the sciences, observations of physical phenomena are made by conducting experiments and recording measurements. For the mathematician, computations, examples, counterexamples, special cases, and diagrams replace microscopes and telescopes as a way of observing and measuring the structure and behavior of mathematical objects. From observations, principles of knowledge are derived by the scientist or mathematician which describe pattern of behavior common to a significant class of examples. In science, these principles are verified by experimentation and further measurement; in mathematics, principles are verified intellectually by mathematical proof.
 Applying knowledge involves extending these general principles to guide progress in some specific area of life. By its very nature, knoeldge will be relevant to that area of life from which it is derived and can serve as the basis for applications in that area. However, it is our experience that mathematics has applications far beyond the boundaries of the area in which it was first developed. Indeed, mathematics is striking in that the concepts, principles, and techniques developed for the understanding of purely non-physical mathematical constructs provide the essential tools that scientists in all areas use to understand their observations and measurements of the physical world. Eugene Wigner, in discussing the success of mathematics in physics, says,
It is important to point out that the mathematical formulation of the physicist's often crude experience leads in an uncanny number of cases to an amazingly accurate description of a large class phenomena.
Moreover, once the scientist's observations have been given a mathematical formulation, the methodology and computations of mathematics can extend these formulations to predictions about behavior that has not yet been observed. This is of enormous importance to the scientist because, as Richard Hamming points out,
Constantly what we predict from the manipulations of mathematical symbols is realized in the real world. ? For glamour, I can cite transistor research, space flight, and computer design, but almost all of science and engineering has used extensive mathematical manipulations with remarkable success.
 The fact that abstract mathematical concepts, which are often only suggested by observations of the physical world and depend mostly on the imagination of applications is indicative of a common source for both mathematics and the physical world.
 As a subjective discipline, mathematics depends on the creativity and aesthetic sensibilities, as well as the intelligence, of the mathematician. Mathematical progress is always in the direction of locating deeper and more abstract concepts, structures, and relationships, every further removed from the physical world. Yet when we look at mathematics in general, or at geometry in particular, we see that the deeper and more abstract the concepts, the greater is the range of application in the real world. In other words, the greater the subjective component of a mathematical theory, the more effective is that theory in its objective role of applications. William Thurston sees this as a natural phenomenon:
My experience as a mathematician has convinced me that the aesthetic goals and the utilitarian goals for mathematics turn out, in the end, to be quite close. Our aesthetic instincts draw us to mathematics of a certain depth and connectivity. The very depth and beauty of patterns make them likely to be manifested, in unexpected ways, in other parts of mathematics, science, and the world.
Mathematical formulations of abstract patterns and relationships appear to be in  many cases our deepest understanding of principles that exist throughout nature. Indeed, we can make the case that the wide applicability of mathematics suggests the interconnectedness of all spheres of life, from the abstract to the concrete. The beauty, orderliness, and universality that we see in all areas of mathematics are reflected in the beauty and orderliness that scientists find in their physical world.

2 The Role of Applications in the Study of Geometry
The full range of geometry is from the most theoretical and abstract theorems based on axioms and undefined terms to varied applications in science and technology, as well as in other areas of mathematics. In recent years, applications of geometry have taken on a more prominent and exciting role, both within and outside of mathematics. For example, computers have spurred the development of many new areas, including computational geometry, image processing, visualization, robotics, and dynamic geometry.
 Today more than ever, the study of applications is an important component in the study of geometry, a subject traditionally valued for its practicality. We gain a broader and richer understanding of geometrical concepts when we see the unexpected applied contexts in which they appear. In applied settings, geometrical concepts can take on new and quite different interpretations; for example, a finite geometry can become a graph or a knot can become a description of a quantum mechanical operator. Finally, there is charm in seeing familiar theorems and principles showing their value in many different roles. Without studying applications, a student will never see the complete character of geometry.
 This collection is an abundant resource for those wishing to include applications in their study of geometry.
 This collection is an abundant resource for those wishing to include applications in their study of geometry. We see here geometry used to describe and understand the shapes that we see in the world around us and geometry used to design the shapes that we construct to enrich our environment. We also see how geometry is used in other branches of mathematics and in science to give shape and form to mathematical data or concepts that are not inherently or intrinsically geometric.

3 Geometry Used to Understand the Environment
Many papers in this collection show ways of applying the tools of geometry to the analysis of shapes that exist in our environment. An important such use is to transform measurements that one is capable of obtaining into the kind of information that one can really use. An old example of this is, of course, surveying, but there are very modern examples as well.
 Ramin Shahidi in "Geometry to the Aid of Surgeons" and Paul Calter in "Fa?ade Measurement by Trigonometry" both use similar geometric techniques. In the first case, measurements of a patient's anatomy made by medical imaging machinery are converted into a potential surgical trajectory. In the second case, measurements made of the fa?ade of a building by surveying instruments are converted into distances between specific points on the fa?ade.
 George Nagy has an analogous problem, that of converting the geographical measurements in a Geographical Information System into a useful format. In a GIS, however, there is so much data that the role of geometry  is to synthesize the data into a format that can readily be interpreted by the researcher. For example, elevation data can be transformed into visibility graphs that can then be used for the optimal placement of fire towers or radio transmitters.
 Of a subtler nature is the question of the arrangement of atoms in a quasicrystal, a kind of material having a new and surprising symmetrical structure as measured by X-ray diffraction. Studying the possible arrangements of atoms in a quasicrystal, Charles Radin has developed the concepts of statistical symmetry, a way of measuring regularities in an arrangement of shapes that is not, strictly speaking, symmetrical.
 The traces left behind by other cultures are sometimes difficult to understand and they can easily be misinterpreted according to the learned fashions of the day. When cultural legacies have shape and form, a geometrical analysis can give us a quite reliable basis from which to make an interpretation of what has been left to us. Marcia Ascher and Jay Kappraff demonstrate how to undertake a geometrical analysis of our cultural legacies. They lead us to a broad-minded appreciation of the possible interpretations that can legitimately be given to what we see in other cultures.
 In her paper on spirals, Kim Williams explains techniques for constructing spirals, volutes, and rosettes so that we can understand the challenges facing architects who have incorporated these beautiful geometric shapes into their work. With this, we gain insight into the intentions of the architects and deeper appreciation for their work.
 David Henderson and John Price both look at writings left by the Vedic civilization and, through close geometric analysis, give insight into the possible reasoning, computations, and motivations behind the geometric constructions given in the Sulba Sutras. As with the examples given by Ascher, Kappraff, and Williams, we see that this expands our view of the achievements of the past.

4 Geometry Used to Build the Environment
 Geometry is essential for designing the shapes that we build to mold our environment. Descriptive, or projective, geometry has been the main tool used by the engineer to develop, record, and communicate plans and designs. Marina Pokrovskaya connects fur us the theoretical aspects of descriptive geometry to simple but realistic examples of the practical applications of descriptive geometry. She shows how these examples can be used in the classroom to train those who will be using descriptive geometry in their work.
 In her paper on rigidity of frameworks, Brigitte Servatius examines the structure of rectangular grids to determine whether or not they are rigid. She shows how the determination whether or not they are rigid. She shows how determination of the rigidity of a structure begins with the side-side-side theorem of Euclidean geometry, and then goes on to show that many other geometric ideas can be applied to the analysis of frameworks. In particular, graph theory is very effective in this area since a framework can be viewed as a collection of rods (edges) connected at joints (vertices).
 In addition to flat surfaces, the designer or engineer needs curves and curved surfaces. Jim Casey develops our understanding of curvature and Riemannian geometry through measurement and experimentation and then introduces us to the analysis of the structural properties of curved surfaces.
 A recent engineering creation is the robot. How should a robot hand be designed so that it can securely grasp any shape? Using the properties of convex sets, Bud Mishra is able to determine the exact number of fingers a robot hand must have, and further, he shows how to determine the placement of those fingers to grasp any given object.
 Kim Williams and Jay Kappraff have used geometrical analysis to deduce the intentions of artists from geometrical evidence in their work. In Paul Calter's paper "Sun Disk, Moon Disk," the artist himself explains his experience of integrating his aesthetic purposes with his mathematical thinking in the design and construction of a massive sculpture. This paper shows firsthand the nature of the mathematical thinking that can go into creating a work of art.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews