Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius
The division of the late Roman Empire into two theoretically cooperating parts by the brothers Valentinian and Valens in 364 deeply influenced many aspects of government in each of the divisions. Although the imperial policies during this well-documented and formative period are generally understood to have been driven by the religious and ideological aims of the emperors, R. Malcolm Errington argues that the emperors were actually much more pragmatic in their decision making than has previously been assumed.

The division of responsibilities between the emperors inevitably encouraged separate developments and allowed locally varying and often changing imperial attitudes toward different forms of religious belief. Errington demonstrates that the main stimulus for action in this period nearly always came from below the level of the imperial government, and not from an imperial initiative. Extending the theory of Fergus Millar into the later empire, Errington argues that the emperors were fundamentally reactive to regionally supplied information, as Millar has asserted was the case for the High Empire. Thus, despite significant structural changes, the empire remained broadly traditional in its operations.

1118398418
Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius
The division of the late Roman Empire into two theoretically cooperating parts by the brothers Valentinian and Valens in 364 deeply influenced many aspects of government in each of the divisions. Although the imperial policies during this well-documented and formative period are generally understood to have been driven by the religious and ideological aims of the emperors, R. Malcolm Errington argues that the emperors were actually much more pragmatic in their decision making than has previously been assumed.

The division of responsibilities between the emperors inevitably encouraged separate developments and allowed locally varying and often changing imperial attitudes toward different forms of religious belief. Errington demonstrates that the main stimulus for action in this period nearly always came from below the level of the imperial government, and not from an imperial initiative. Extending the theory of Fergus Millar into the later empire, Errington argues that the emperors were fundamentally reactive to regionally supplied information, as Millar has asserted was the case for the High Empire. Thus, despite significant structural changes, the empire remained broadly traditional in its operations.

26.49 In Stock
Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius

Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius

by R. Malcolm Errington
Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius

Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius

by R. Malcolm Errington

eBook

$26.49  $30.00 Save 12% Current price is $26.49, Original price is $30. You Save 12%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

The division of the late Roman Empire into two theoretically cooperating parts by the brothers Valentinian and Valens in 364 deeply influenced many aspects of government in each of the divisions. Although the imperial policies during this well-documented and formative period are generally understood to have been driven by the religious and ideological aims of the emperors, R. Malcolm Errington argues that the emperors were actually much more pragmatic in their decision making than has previously been assumed.

The division of responsibilities between the emperors inevitably encouraged separate developments and allowed locally varying and often changing imperial attitudes toward different forms of religious belief. Errington demonstrates that the main stimulus for action in this period nearly always came from below the level of the imperial government, and not from an imperial initiative. Extending the theory of Fergus Millar into the later empire, Errington argues that the emperors were fundamentally reactive to regionally supplied information, as Millar has asserted was the case for the High Empire. Thus, despite significant structural changes, the empire remained broadly traditional in its operations.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780807877456
Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press
Publication date: 10/16/2007
Series: Studies in the History of Greece and Rome
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 352
File size: 570 KB

About the Author

R. Malcolm Errington is professor of ancient history at the Philipps-Universitat in Marburg, Germany. He is author of three other books, including A History of Macedonia.

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

Thoughtful and highly readable. . . . [A] rewarding [and] substantial contribution to the study of this era. —The Historian

Lays out the evidence . . . clearly, and the whole book is essential reading for those interested in the 4th century.—Ancient History: Resources for Teachers

Builds on several [of Errington's] groundbreaking articles. . . . A model of sensible large-scale analysis. . . . It is a sign of the book's excellence that one can disagree with . . . large questions of interpretation while remaining wholly convinced by the many specific discussions that here sustain them.—The Classical Bulletin

Errington's is a sweeping revisionist treatment of the 32 years between the death of Julian and the death of Theodosius in which he explores the fundamentally reactive nature of Roman government and how that affected the monumental changes witnessed by the empire. Crystal clear in its organization and writing, this book offers a major contribution to the growing debate about politics and administration in this crucial period.—Noel Lenski, University of Colorado Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century AD

A detailed investigation. . . . Solid analyses of issues of government will underpin future discussions.—Journal of Roman Studies

This is a traditional institutional history of the later Roman empire. . . . It enhances our understanding of a turbulent time.—The Journal of Military History

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews