eBook
Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
Related collections and offers
Overview
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9780752484099 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | The History Press |
| Publication date: | 02/29/2012 |
| Series: | Sutton True Crime History |
| Sold by: | Barnes & Noble |
| Format: | eBook |
| Pages: | 160 |
| File size: | 3 MB |
| Age Range: | 5 - 7 Years |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
Worcestershire Murders
By Nicola Sly
The History Press
Copyright © 2012 Nicola SlyAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-7524-8409-9
CHAPTER 1
'THE GIRL LOOKS JUST THE SAME AS SHE DID WHEN SHE WAS ASLEEP'
Berrow, 1780
In the early hours of the morning of 7 May 1780, Mr Player, a cottager from Berrow, was awakened from his sleep by a terrible howling noise coming from the direction of his neighbour's home. Player shook his wife awake and together they listened intently for a few moments, hearing the howls repeated, closely followed by a loud thumping sound, as if something heavy had fallen onto a wooden floor.
Courageously, Mr Player got up and went to investigate the dreadful noises. The front door to his neighbour's cottage was tightly closed, but Player could hear sounds coming from within. He shouted several times for his neighbour, Edward Gummary, but received no reply so he eventually walked round to the back of the cottage. The back door was also closed, but Player could hear someone moving about in the kitchen. Assuming that it was Edward's wife, Elizabeth, Player called out to her, but again received no response.
Concerned, he ran back to his own cottage and roused his wife, telling her that there appeared to be something dreadfully wrong at the Gummary's home. Mrs Player accompanied her husband back to their neighbour's cottage, where now the front door stood wide open. To their horror, the Players could see blood dripping through the kitchen ceiling from the bedroom above. Mr Player immediately rushed upstairs, where a scene of terrible carnage awaited him.
Two dead bodies lay on the floor of the bedroom, close to the bed. The sight so upset Mr Player that he found himself unable to check on the other occupants of the house. Instead, he and his wife rushed to summon assistance from neighbours.
When somebody finally had the stomach to investigate the Gummary's cottage more closely, they found that one of the bodies on the bedroom floor was that of Edward Gummary. He had a large wound between his collarbone and his neck, which had penetrated his chest and almost severed his arm from his body. He had numerous other injuries, including cuts to his head and face, a deep wound below his ribcage through which parts of his bowel protruded, a leg wound with a broken fibula, and several deep cuts to his hands, which suggested that he had fought desperately with his attackers. Close by lay his wife, with wounds to her face and head that were deep enough to expose her brain. Her nose had been completely chopped from her face.
Actually in the bed was the body of the Gummary's nine-year-old daughter, Ann. A deep wound to the side of her neck had severed both her jugular artery and her spine. Finally, in a neighbouring bedroom, a visitor to the house lay dead. Elizabeth Gummary's brother, Thomas Sheen, had serious wounds to his head and chest.
All of the bodies were dressed in their nightclothes and, it seemed, had been savagely attacked by someone frenziedly wielding a weapon, such as an axe, while they lay sleeping peacefully in their beds.
The alarm was raised immediately and neighbours quickly launched a hunt for any strangers in the area. In a field about a quarter of a mile from the Gummary's house, six gypsies were rounded up and handed over to the authorities, although there was no real evidence to connect any one of them with the slaughter of the entire Gummary family. A young child who was with the travelling families tearfully told the villagers, 'It was not my daddy that killed them, but two men who are gone to Tewkesbury.'
One of the gypsies had a small amount of blood on his clothing and a bloody stick was found in his possession. Taken back to the scene of the crime, he was alleged to have said, 'The girl looks just the same as she did when she was asleep.' However, it was apparent that, given the extent of the massacre within the house, any man who had been involved would have had more than a small amount of blood on his person and eventually the gypsy families were released without charge.
An inquest was opened before coroner Harry Long and a verdict of 'wilful murder by person or persons unknown' was recorded on all four victims. The bodies were buried on 11 May 1780 in Berrow churchyard, their final resting place later marked with a memorial plaque on the outside wall of the church.
There were no clues to the identity of the assailant or assailants and indeed, it was impossible to even suggest a motive for the brutal murders of the entire family. None of the victims was known to have any enemies, or to have recently quarrelled with anybody. The cottage showed no signs of having been ransacked and considerable sums of money were found untouched. A total of 29s 8d in coins was found in the cottage, in addition to 3s 6d farthing in the pockets of Thomas Sheen, and it was generally agreed that this was about the correct amount that should have been in the possession of the deceased family, meaning that theft was not a motive for their slaughter.
With no conceivable motive, no clues and absolutely no evidence, it seemed as if whoever had killed the Gummary family had literally got away with murder. Two men, William Jones and William Addis, who had been caught destroying the nearby Malvern Link fence, were strongly suspected of being the murderers at the time but, since there was no concrete evidence against them, they could only be charged with destroying the fence, for which both were imprisoned.
In fact, it was to be almost thirty years before a possible clue to the identity of the killer or killers emerged. In January 1809, an eighty-year-old man was admitted to the Worcester Royal Infirmary with a broken leg. Delirious with pain, James Traynton began to talk. Another patient heard his ramblings and immediately recognised what he believed to be details of the murder of the Gummary family, so many years earlier.
When questioned directly, Traynton seemed to have some knowledge of the murders, although he would only admit to helping to destroy the fence, holding a ladder against the window and supplying the murderers with drink. He assured nurses that all the murderers were still alive and of a similar age to himself, telling them that the murders had been committed using 'bills'. (A 'bill' is a shortened name for a billhook, a sharp, long-bladed hatchet used for hedge trimming.) In between talking about the murders, Traynton raved about being pursued by demons, judged by his fellow patients as being the signs of a guilty conscience.
Traynton died four days after his admission to hospital, unfortunately without naming any of the alleged murderers of the Gummary family. It was established after his death that he had once worked as a labourer on the Malvern Link enclosure and had, in the past, been thought of as a 'bad character'.
Whether or not Traynton's demented ramblings betrayed his involvement in the slaying of an entire family will now never be known and officially the case remains unsolved.
Note: In some accounts the family name is given as Gummery. I have used the spelling shown on the memorial stone although, of course, there is no guarantee that the mason was correct in his interpretation.
CHAPTER 2'WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH HIM NOW?'
Oddingley, 1806 and 1830
On 24 June 1806, Thomas Giles and John Lench were walking along a lane near Oddingley when they heard the report of a gun, followed by a shout of 'Murder!' The two men rushed to investigate and soon came across a man skulking in the hedgerow, a bag in his hand.
'Villain, what have you been doing?' the men asked him.
'Me? Nothing,' replied the man, dropping his bag and running off.
A few yards further along the lane, the two men became aware of something burning on the ground. When they got closer, they realised that it was in fact a man who had obviously been shot and whose clothes were now on fire.
Lench began to pull the man's burning clothes from his body and, once he was sure that all the flames had been extinguished, he set off in pursuit of the man who had just fled. Meanwhile, Giles ran to the nearest house to summon help. That house turned out to be the vicarage and a servant there sent for the rector of the next parish, Reginald Pynder, who was at that time also acting as a County Magistrate. Pynder immediately saddled his horse and galloped to where the badly injured man lay, and, on his arrival, he was surprised to find that the victim of the shooting was Revd George Parker, the rector of the parish of Oddingley. Sadly, Parker died within minutes of Pynder's arrival.
It was apparent from Parker's injuries that his assailant had first shot him, the ball penetrating his right side. Seeing that his victim was still alive, the gunman had then clubbed him over the head with the butt of his gun, which had broken, leaving Revd Parker with two large cuts over his left eye. Finally, he had set his victim on fire, at which point he had been interrupted by the unexpected arrival of Giles and Lench.
The bag that the attacker had dropped was found to contain the pieces of a broken gun. Soon, John Lench returned from his pursuit of the murderer to say that he had almost caught up with him when the man had put his hand in his pocket as if to withdraw a pistol and threatened to shoot Lench if he came any nearer. Wisely, Lench backed off, leaving his quarry to escape across the fields.
Giles and Lench described the attacker as being about 5ft 5in tall, with dark brown hair, balding at the front. A black beard framed his face and he was wearing a long, blue coat with metal buttons. This sounded to the police very much like a description of Richard Hemming from Oddingley, who, although he worked legitimately as a carpenter, was known locally as a shady character, whom the police suspected of being responsible for several robberies in the area.
By the time the police got to Hemming's home, he was nowhere to be found. Enquiries revealed that he had been seen heading towards Worcester on the afternoon of Parker's murder and he was later seen at a public house. There was one more alleged sighting of him a week later, when a girl told police that she believed that she had seen him running into a wood. However, the police never managed to catch Richard Hemming who, it seemed, had disappeared without a trace, leaving his wife and three young children behind. Even if he was a man of suspicious character, Elizabeth Hemming swore that Richard was a loving husband and father and insisted that he would never have left without telling her.
An inquest was opened into Parker's murder on the following day, at which the foreman of the coroner's jury was a man named Captain Evans. There were later to be allegations of malpractice at the inquest, with some evidence not being presented and the proceedings being rushed in order to conclude them within the day. However, the jury eventually returned a verdict of 'murder against some person or persons at present unknown'.
There were so many complaints about the inquest that the county magistrates felt obliged to hold an investigation. As foreman of the jury, Captain Evans, was interviewed and told the magistrates that he was so keen to see Parker's murderer apprehended that he was personally starting a fund to provide a reward for anyone with information about the killer. This so impressed the magistrates that they immediately offered a donation of £50 towards the fund.
Since the only viable suspect in the murder of Revd Parker seemed to have vanished off the face of the earth, the police found themselves at a standstill with their investigations and the case went cold. It was not until 1830 that it was revived, after the discovery of a body at Netherwood Farm in the village.
At that time, a barn at the farm was in a bad state of repair and the tenants asked their landlord, Mr Galton, if they might demolish it. Galton agreed and the Waterson family engaged the services of a local labourer, Charles Burton, to carry out the demolition. Burton began work on 21 January 1830 and, while digging round the barn's foundations, he discovered an old boot buried in the ground, a skeletal foot still in it. His next shovel-full of earth contained a second boot and foot; Burton stopped digging and notified the police.
The earth around the barn's foundations was loose and, when the police dug down to a depth of 18in, they uncovered the complete skeleton of a man, lying on his left side. The man's skull was cracked and his upper and lower jaws were broken. As well as the man's remains, the police also excavated the remnants of a woollen waistcoat and some cord trousers. Various personal effects were buried with the man, including a few coins, a whetstone, a clasp knife and a carpenter's slide rule.
As the wife of the only man known to be missing in the area, Elizabeth Hemming was called to view these items and identified the boots and the rule as being the property of her husband, Richard. She recalled a crack in the rule where it had once been dropped and recognised the boots by their turned up toes and by nails in the heels. (Coincidentally, labourer Charles Burton was Elizabeth's brother.)
At the time that Hemming had disappeared, Thomas Clewes had owned Netherwood Farm and he was promptly arrested on suspicion of his murder. Coroner Mr Smith opened an inquest at the Talbot Inn into Hemming's death and, on the third day of the proceedings, Clewes' gaoler passed a message to the coroner saying that Clewes wished to make a statement.
Revd Parker had been a kindly man, who was always willing to help any of his parishioners who might be in need. That said, he was not a popular man, as he was also extremely parsimonious and was a stickler for collecting the biggest possible tithes from the wealthier villagers.
Parker's position as rector was unsalaried and thus he survived solely on the annual tithes that he collected. These were normally a tenth of any produce or stock held by landowners each year and were payable either in goods or in cash. The payment of the tithes had long been disputed by the landowners of Oddingley and, when Revd Parker took over as rector of the parish, he apparently became a little greedy and insisted that the landowners paid their dues in kind.
The average tithes paid by each landowner was £30 a year, but as a result of the war in France, the price of goods rocketed, meaning that, by paying in kind, the landowners were paying much more than the amount they might reasonably have expected to pay. As a group, they approached the Revd Parker asking if they might pay in cash instead, even offering to increase their cash payments to £70 a year, but Parker refused. He added insult to injury by trying to insist that, since the landowners were paying him with goods, it was their responsibility to buy him a barn at a cost of £150, in which to keep the animals and store the grain with which they were paying him. The last straw for the farmers was when Revd Parker then complained bitterly about the cost of the dinners that the men regularly held at a nearby pub, the God Speed the Plough Inn.
Clewes told the inquest that he and five other men had got together and made a decision that something must be done about the situation. The leader of the breakaway group was Captain Evans – the man who had served as foreman of the jury at the inquest into Parker's death – and he was joined in his scheming by Clewes, John Barnett, Joseph Taylor and brothers William and George Banks.
As prominent citizens, it was obviously impossible for the conspirators to be directly implicated in Parker's death themselves, hence Richard Hemming was hired for the sum of £50 to kill the rector and provided with a gun by Captain Evans. However, once the deed was done and Evans and his cohorts realised that Hemming had been seen, they found themselves in a quandary. If Hemming were arrested for the murder, then he would surely try to save his own skin by telling the authorities who it was in the village that had wanted Parker dead.
Hemming was told to hide himself in Thomas Clewes' barn while a plan was hatched for his escape. At eleven o'clock on the night after the murder, Evans, Taylor and George Banks called at Clewes' home and the four men went out to the barn, where Richard Hemming had concealed himself under some loose straw. Evans called out to Hemming, telling him that he had brought some food for him. As Hemming wriggled out from under the straw, Joseph Taylor, the village blacksmith, stepped forward and hit him two or three times over the head with his blood stick. (A blood stick was a piece of hard wood, loaded at one end with lead and resembling a small mallet in appearance, used when bleeding horses, to strike a blade into a vein.)
Clewes professed himself to have been appalled at this, saying that it had been his belief that Hemming was to be given money and helped to escape. Had he known what was actually going to happen, said Clewes, he would never have gone to the barn. However, there was no time for recriminations as the men now had a dead body on their hands and a pressing need to dispose of it. 'What is to be done with him now?' asked Taylor.
Captain Evans supervised the digging of a hole near the outside wall of the barn then he and Taylor unceremoniously dragged Hemming's body outside and buried it in the hole. The entire process took less than thirty minutes.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from Worcestershire Murders by Nicola Sly. Copyright © 2012 Nicola Sly. Excerpted by permission of The History Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Contents
Author's Note & Acknowledgements,1. 'The girl looks just the same as she did when she was asleep' Berrow, 1780,
2. 'What is to be done with him now?' Oddingley, 1806 and 1830,
3. 'Why didst thou leave me?' Lye Waste, 1829,
4. 'Don't cry, my child, and I will get you some flowers' Old Swinford, 1830,
5. 'I planned the murder for days and even dreamed about it' Areley Kings, 1836,
6. 'What was I to do, kicked and abused as I was?' Rous Lench, 1842,
7. 'Have you seen my little whore?' Drakes Broughton, 1848,
8. 'How could you be such a cruel mother?' Near Stourbridge, 1852,
9. 'I have heard them say revenge is sweet' Dudley, 1855,
10. 'Her ain't dead, is her?' Oldbury, 1862,
11. 'Somebody ought to mind him' Holt Fleet, 1864,
12. 'Each must take care of himself' Bromsgrove, 1872,
13. 'If ever I was to meet with him I should be a match for him' Alvechurch, 1885,
14. 'Let the bastard have it!' Lenchwick, 1889,
15. 'Life is worth little to me' Long Eye, 1893,
16. 'Tell Will his mother's nearly dead' Foxlydiate, 1902,
17. 'Murder will out some day' Kidderminster, 1903,
18. 'He went at me with great revenge' Worcester, 1905,
19. 'I consider he is a perfectly sane man' Worcester, 1925,
20. 'Look how she has served me out' Lye, 1925,
21. 'Come on, let's die together' Northfield, 1942,
22. 'Who put Bella in the wych elm?' Hagley Wood, 1943,
23. 'Are you all right?' Bromsgrove, 1944,
24. 'I want to say it was a sudden urge' Kidderminster, 1958,
25. 'You'll get the same dose as your mate when you come out' Worcester, 1961,
Bibliography & References,