0

    The Storm of War: A New History of the Second World War

    3.6 63

    by Andrew Roberts


    Paperback

    $19.99
    $19.99

    Customer Reviews

    • ISBN-13: 9780061228605
    • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
    • Publication date: 05/29/2012
    • Pages: 712
    • Sales rank: 33,298
    • Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 8.80(h) x 1.50(d)

    Andrew Roberts is the author of Masters and Commanders and A History of the English-Speaking Peoples Since 1900. His other books include Napoleon and Wellington, Eminent Churchillians, and Salisbury, which won the Wolfson History Prize. A Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, he holds a PhD in history from Cambridge University and writes regularly for The Wall Street Journal and The Daily Beast. He lives in New York City.

    Read an Excerpt

    The Storm of War

    A New History of the Second World War
    By Andrew Roberts

    HarperCollins

    Copyright © 2011 Andrew Roberts
    All right reserved.

    ISBN: 9780061228599


    Chapter One

    Four Invasions
    September 1939–April 1940
    If we lose this war, then God have mercy on us.
    Hermann Go¨ ring to Hitler's interpreter,
    Paul Schmidt, 3 September 1939

    Although the international situation, and his months of saber rattling
    against Poland, meant that his invasion of that country could not be
    a surprise attack, Hitler hoped, with good reason, that the Wehrmacht's
    new Blitzkrieg (lightning war) tactics would deliver a tactical
    shock to the Poles. Blitzkrieg tactics, which relied on very close,
    radio-controlled contact between fast-moving tank columns,
    motorized artillery, Luftwaffe bombers and fighters and truck borne
    infantry, swept all before them. Hitler's dislike of static, attritional warfare
    was a natural response to his years in the 16th Bavarian Infantry
    Regiment between 1914 and 1918. His job as a Meldeganger
    (battalion runner) in that conflict involved waiting for a gap in artillery
    salvoes and then springing forward in a semi-crouched stance, sprinting
    from trench to shell-hole taking messages. He was thus brave
    and conscientious, probably never killed anyone himself, and always
    refused promotions that would take him away from his comrades
    because, as his regimental adjutant Fritz Wiedemann later stated, 'For
    Gefreiter [Corporal] Hitler, the Regiment was home.'2 He even won
    two Iron Crosses, Second Class and First Class.
    Having survived four years of stalemate and attrition, Hitler had learned by
    the age of twenty-nine, when the war ended, that tactical surprise was of
    inestimable advantage in warfare, and as he was later to write in Mein Kampf:
    'Even a man of thirty will have much to learn in the course of his life, but
    this will only be a supplement.' Throughout
    his political career as a revolutionary, he constantly attempted to
    employ surprise, usually with great success. The attempted coup of
    1923 known as the Beerhall Putsch had surprised even its titular
    leader, General Ludendorff, and Rohm had had no inkling of the
    Night of the Long Knives. Yet the Poles were expecting Hitler's sudden
    attack, because exactly one week beforehand their country had been
    invaded by a tiny detachment of Germans who had not been informed
    of the postponement of the invasion originally planned for dawn on
    Saturday, 26 August.
    Part of Germany's plan to invade Poland, Fall Weiss (Plan White),
    involved small groups of Germans dressed in Rauberzivil (robbers'
    civvies) crossing the border the night before and seizing key strategic
    points before dawn on the day of the invasion. The secret Abwehr
    (German intelligence) battalion detailed to undertake these operations
    was given the euphemistic title of Construction Training Company
    800 for Special Duties. A twenty-four-man group under the command
    of Lieutenant Dr Hans-Albrecht Herzner was instructed to prepare the
    way for the assault of the 7th Infantry Division by infiltrating the
    border and capturing a railway station at Mosty in the Jablunka Pass
    running through the Carpathian mountains, to prevent the destruction
    of the single-track railway tunnel which was the shortest connection
    between Warsaw and Vienna.3 Crossing the border into the forests at
    00.30 on 26 August, Herzner's group got lost and was split up in the
    dark, but Herzner managed to capture the railway station at Mosty
    with thirteen men at 03.30 and cut the telephone and telegraph lines,
    only to discover that the Polish detonators had already been removed
    from the tunnel by the defenders. Polish tunnel guards then attacked
    his unit, wounding one of his men. Out of contact with the Abwehr,
    Herzner could not know that, with only a few hours to go, the
    previous evening Hitler had postponed Plan White until the following
    week, and that every other commando unit had been informed of this
    except his. It was not until 09.35 that the Abwehr finally managed to
    get through and order Herzner, who by then had lost another man
    wounded and had killed a Pole in the firefight, to release his prisoners
    and return to base immediately.
    After a further series of incidents Herzner's group recrossed the
    border at 13.30. The German Government explained to the Poles that
    the whole affair had been a mistake due to the lack of a defined border
    line in the forest. As the operation had not been an official military
    one, therefore, and had taken place in peacetime, Herzner very
    teutonically put in for overnight expenses of 55 Reichsmarks and
    86 pfennigs. Equally teutonically, the authorities did not initially
    want to award him the Iron Cross (Second Class) for exploits that
    technically took place in peacetime. (They eventually did, but it did
    him little good after breaking his back in a motor accident in 1942
    Herzner drowned during his swimming therapy.)
    On 28 August Hitler had abrogated the 1934 German–Polish
    non-aggression treaty – a curious and unusual act of legalism from him –
    so the Poles could hardly have had a clearer indication that Germany
    was on the verge of invading their country, but they could have had
    little intimation of Blitzkrieg tactics, hitherto the preserve of certain
    German and British theoretical tacticians. They could estimate
    accurately where and roughly when the attack would come, but crucially
    not how. The Poles therefore chose to place the bulk of their troops
    close to the German border. The Munich crisis the previous autumn, and Hitler's
    seizure of Therumpof Czechoslovakia the following spring,
    meant that Poland's border with the Reich had been extended from
    1,250 to a full 1,750 miles, much further than the Polish Army could
    adequately defend. Its commander-in-chief, Marshal Edward
    S´migły-Rydz, therefore had to decide whether to keep the majority of his forces
    back behind the natural defensive line formed by the Vistula, San and
    Narev rivers, or to try to protect Poland's industrial heartlands and
    best agricultural land in the west of the country.
    S'migły-Rydz decided to commit his troops to defending every inch
    of Polish soil, which left them perilously exposed. He attempted to
    deploy across the whole front from Lithuania to the Carpathians, and
    even kept a special assault group for invading East Prussia, retaining
    one-third of his force in Poznia and the Polish Corridor. As so often
    in the history of poor, martyred Poland, the dispositions were brave;
    otherwise S´migły-Rydz would simply have had to abandon cities as
    important as Krako´w, Poznan´, Bydgoszcz and Ło´dz´, which all lay to
    the west of the three rivers. Nonetheless, it is hard not to agree with
    Major-General Frederick von Mellenthin, then the intelligence officer
    of the German III Corps, that Polish 'plans were lacking a sense of
    reality'.
    At 17.30 hours on Thursday, 31 August 1939, Hitler ordered hostilities
    to start the next morning, and this time there would be no
    postponement. So at 04.45 on Friday, 1 September German forces
    activated Plan White, which had been formulated that June by the
    German Army High Command, the Oberkommando des Heeres
    (OKH). The OKH was composed of the commander-in-chief of the
    Field Army (Feldheer), the Army General Staff, the Army Personnel
    Office and the commander-in-chief of the Reserve Army (Ersatzheer).
    Above the OKH in terms of creating grand strategy was the
    Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (Armed Forces High Command, or OKW).
    Soon after assuming personal command of the German armed forces
    in February 1938, Hitler had created the OKW to function as his
    military staff under his direct command, with Keitel as its chief.
    Whereas Blomberg had been strenuously opposed by the Navy and
    Army in his efforts to set up a unified high command, Hitler was not
    to be baulked. In August 1939, when general mobilization went ahead,
    OKW consisted of the office of the Chief of Staff (Keitel), a central
    administrative division, the armed forces administration office (under
    Jodl) which kept Hitler informed of the military situation, an
    Intelligence office under Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, a war production office
    and various smaller units concerned with military justice and finance.
    According to Plan White, on either side of a relatively weak and
    stationary center, two powerful wings of the Wehrmacht would
    envelop Poland, crush its armed forces and capture Warsaw. Army
    Group North, under Colonel-General Fedor von Bock, would smash
    through the Polish Corridor, take Danzig (present-day Gdan´sk), unite
    with the German Third Army in East Prussia, and move swiftly to
    attack the Polish capital from the north. Meanwhile an even stronger
    Army Group South, under Colonel-General Gerd von Rundstedt,
    would punch between the larger Polish forces facing it; push east all
    the way to Lvov, but also assault Warsaw from the west and north.
    (At the Jablunka Pass, the Poles did at least destroy the railway tunnel,
    which was not reopened until 1948.)
    The Polish Corridor, which had been intended by the framers of
    the Versailles Treaty of 1919 to cut off East Prussia from the rest of
    Germany, had long been presented as a casus belli by the Nazis, as
    had the ethnically German Baltic port of Danzig, but as Hitler had
    told a conference of generals in May 1939, 'Danzig is not the real
    issue; the real point is for us to open up our Lebensraum to the east
    and ensure our supplies of foodstuffs.' Yet much more than mere
    practicalities drove Hitler. This was to be an existential conflict,
    fulfilling the prophecies he had made fourteen years before in his political
    testimony Mein Kampf. The German master race would subjugate the
    Slavs – Untermenschen (subhumans) according to Nazi precepts of
    racial hierarchy – and use their territory to nurture a new Aryan
    civilization. This was to be the world's first wholly politically
    ideological war, and it is a contention of this book that that was the primary
    reason why the Nazis eventually lost it.
    The strategy of having a weak center and two powerful flanks was
    a brilliant one, and was believed to have derived from Field Marshal
    Count Alfred von Schlieffen's celebrated pre-Great War study of
    Hannibal's tactics at the battle of Cannae. Whatever the provenance
    it worked well, slipping German armies neatly between Polish ones
    and enabling them to converge on Warsaw from different angles almost
    simultaneously. Yet what made it irresistible was not German
    preponderance in men and arms, but above all the new military doctrine of
    Blitzkrieg. Poland was a fine testing ground for Blitzkrieg tactics:
    although it had lakes, forests and bad roads, it was nonetheless flat, with
    immensely wide fronts and firm, late summer ground ideal for tanks.
    Because the British and French Governments, fearful that Germany
    was about to invade at any moment, had given their guarantee to
    Poland on 1 April 1939, with the British Prime Minister Neville
    Chamberlain formally promising her 'all support in the power' of the
    Allies should she be attacked, Hitler was forced to leave a large
    proportion of his hundred-division Army in the west, guarding the
    Siegfried Line, or 'West Wall' – a 3-mile-deep series of still-incomplete
    fortifications along Germany's western frontier. The fear of a war on
    two fronts led the Fu¨hrer to detail no fewer than forty divisions to
    protect his back. However, three-quarters of these were only second
    rate units and they had been left with only three days' ammunition.
    His best troops, along with all his armored and mobile divisions and
    almost all his aircraft, Hitler devoted to the attack on Poland.
    Plan White was drawn up by the OKH planners, with Hitler merely
    putting his imprimatur on the final document. At this early stage of
    the war there was a good deal of genuine mutual respect between
    Hitler and his generals, aided by the fact that he had not so far
    interfered too closely in their troop dispositions and planning; his two
    Iron Crosses gave him some standing with his generals. Hitler's own
    self-confidence in military affairs was singular. This may have come
    in part from the sense of superiority of many veteran infantrymen
    that it was they who had borne the brunt of the fighting in the Great
    War. Both the OKW Chief of Staff Wilhelm Keitel, and his
    lieutenant, the Chief of the Wehrmacht Operations Staff, Alfred Jodl, had
    been artillerymen and Staff officers in the Great War: their battle had
    been an indirect one, although Keitel had been wounded. General
    Walther von Reichenau, Colonel-General Walther von Brauchitsch
    and General Hans von Kluge were also artillerymen, and General Paul
    von Kleist and Lieutenant-General Erich Manstein had been in the
    cavalry (although Manstein too had been wounded). Some generals,
    such as Heinz Guderian, had been in Signals, and others such as
    Maximilian von Weichs had spent most of the war on the General
    Staff. Whatever the reason, Hitler was not as cowed as an ex-corporal
    would usually have been among generals. Although he had been a mere
    Meldeganger, he would also have learnt something about tactics.
    It is possible that had Hitler been a German citizen he would have
    been commissioned; knowing this himself, he might well have emerged
    from the war with a sense of being capable of commanding a battalion,
    which only a technicality had prevented.

    Many of the generals of 1939 had spent the 1920s in the paramilitary
    militia known as the Freikorps and the tiny 'Treaty' Army that was permitted under
    Versailles. Before Hitler came to power, this had involved little more
    than Staff work, training and studying. That would not have overly
    impressed Hitler, whatever titular rank those serving in it had
    achieved. For all that former Lieutenant-Colonel Winston Churchill was to mock
    'Corporal' Hitler for his lowly Great War rank in the trenches, the Fuhrer
    seems to have been under no inferiority complex when dealing directly with
    soldiers who had wildly outranked him in the previous conflict.
    Plan White devoted sixty divisions to the conquest of Poland, including
    five Panzer divisions of 300 tanks each, four light divisions (of
    fewer tanks and some horses) and four fully motorized divisions (with
    lorry-borne infantry), as well as 3,600 operational aircraft and much
    of the powerful Kriegsmarine (German Navy). Poland meanwhile had
    only thirty infantry divisions, eleven cavalry brigades, two mechanized
    brigades, 300 medium and light tanks, 1,154 field guns and 400
    aircraft ready for combat (of which only 36 Łos´ aircraft were not
    obsolete), as well as a fleet of only four modern destroyers and five
    submarines. Although these forces comprised fewer than one million
    men, Poland tried to mobilize her reservists, but that was far from
    complete when the devastating blow fell from 630,000 German troops
    under Bock and 886,000 under Rundstedt.
    As dawn broke on 1 September, Heinkel He-111 bombers, with
    top speeds of 350kph carrying 2,000-kilogram loads, as well as
    Dorniers and Junkers Ju-87 (Stuka) dive-bombers, began pounding Polish
    roads, airfields, railway junctions, munition dumps, mobilization
    centers and cities, including Warsaw. Meanwhile, the training ship
    Schleswig Holstein in Danzig Harbor started shelling the Polish
    garrison at Westerplatte. The Stukas had special sirens attached whose
    screams hugely intensified the terror of those below.

    (Continues...)



    Excerpted from The Storm of War by Andrew Roberts Copyright © 2011 by Andrew Roberts. Excerpted by permission of HarperCollins. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
    Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

    Table of Contents

    List of Illustrations xi

    List of Maps xv

    Preface liii

    Prelude: The Pact 1

    Part I Onslaught

    1 Four Invasions: September 1939-April 1940 15

    2 Führer Imperator: May-June 1940 48

    3 Last Hope Island: June 1940-June 1941 87

    4 Contesting the Littoral: September 1939-June 1942 119

    5 Kicking in the Door: June-December 1941 136

    6 Tokyo Typhoon: December 1941-May 1942 185

    Part II Climacteric

    7 The Everlasting Shame of Mankind: 1939-1945 219

    8 Five Minutes at Midway: June 1942-October 1944 251

    9 Midnight in the Devil's Gardens: July 1942-May 1943 281

    10 The Motherland Overwhelms the Fatherland: January 1942-February 1943 315

    11 The Waves of Air and Sea: 1939-1945 346

    12 Up the Wasp-Waist Peninsula: July 1943-May 1945 375

    Part III Retribution

    13 A Salient Reversal: March-August 1943 409

    14 The Cruel Reality: 1939-1945 429

    15 Norman Conquest: June-August 1944 461

    16 Western Approaches: August 1944-March 1945 491

    17 Eastern Approaches: August 1943-May 1945 520

    18 The Land of the Setting Sun: October 1944-September 1945 564

    Conclusion: Why Did the Axis Lose the Second World War? 578

    Notes 609

    Bibliography 648

    Index 677

    What People are Saying About This

    From the Publisher

    "Roberts gives [listeners] a new, well-written retelling of the spectacular ebb and flow of World War II." —-Library Journal Starred Review

    Eligible for FREE SHIPPING details

    Choose Expedited Delivery at checkout for delivery by. Tuesday, January 14

    Andrew Roberts's acclaimed new history has been hailed as the finest single-volume account of this epic conflict. From the western front to North Africa, from the Baltic to the Far East, he tells the story of the war—the grand strategy and the individual experience, the brutality and the heroism—as never before.

    Meticulously researched and masterfully written, The Storm of War illuminates the war's principal actors, revealing how their decisions shaped the course of the conflict. Along the way, Roberts presents tales of the many lesser-known individuals whose experiences form a panoply of the courage and self-sacrifice, as well as the depravity and cruelty, of the Second World War.

    Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

    Recently Viewed 

    Timothy Snyder
    Gripping. . . . splendid history. A brilliantly clear and accessible account of the war in all its theaters. Roberts’s prose is unerringly precise and strikingly vivid. It is hard to imagine a better-told military history of World War II.
    Michael Korda
    With his new book on the Second World War, British historian Andrew Roberts has not only written the single best history of that conflict but has also claimed his place as one of our top historians.
    Roger Kimball
    Roberts is a great historian because of a rare triune mastery: of the movement of history, in both its broad sweep and particular revelatory detail; a felicitous prose style and gift for narrative; and a commanding moral vision.
    Sir - Ian Kershaw
    "Andrew Roberts achieves a marvel of concision in producing a splendidly written, comprehensive new history of the greatest conflict in history, The Storm of War—particularly good in its insights into Axis strategy."
    Nigel Jones
    In what might be his best book yet, Roberts gives us the war as seen from the other side of the hill. He has the knack of making complex military operations comprehensible and salting the grand strategic sweep with vignettes of how it felt to be a soldier.
    Piers Brendon
    Roberts is a first-rate historian. He has a sharp eye for a good subject and a knack of getting to its heart. The second world war, which cost more than 50 million lives, has a perennial fascination that Roberts conveys through an admirably lucid narrative.
    Tina Brown
    In one irresistibly readable book, Roberts has done what I thought was impossible—given us the whole bloody second world war from the brass buttons of the generals down to the mud-filled trenches and stretching across the globe.
    Simon Sebag Montefiore
    The best full history of World War II yet written.
    The Wall Street Journal
    Elegantly balances fact, thought and fresh, clear prose. . . . Roberts has set a high bar for future historians of mankind’s greatest bloodbath; Roberts splendidly weaves a human tragedy into a story of war’s remorseless statistics.
    Sir Ian Kershaw
    Andrew Roberts achieves a marvel of concision in producing a splendidly written, comprehensive new history of the greatest conflict in history, The Storm of War—particularly good in its insights into Axis strategy.
    National Review
    Roberts’s narrative gifts are such that it is almost impossible to read his retelling of these nightmares without some feeling of encountering the new. No history book can ever truly be definitive, but this comes close. Roberts never loses sight of the human side of this epic.
    The Economist
    A magnificent book. . . . It manages to be distinctive but not eccentric, comprehensive in scope but not cramped by detail, giving due weight both to the extraordinary personalities and to the blind economic and physical forces involved.
    The Tucson Citizen
    Roberts underscores the factors that affected the war’s outcome and raises a number of intriguing questions. . . . Accessible, meticulously researched, and executed with clarity.
    The American Spectator
    A concise but comprehensive history that gets to the heart of one mankind’s greatest struggles. . . . Thanks to Roberts’s mastery of substance, style, and, yes, statistics, readers can now enjoy a one-volume history of that war that is far superior to most of the works preceding it.
    National Review
    Roberts’s narrative gifts are such that it is almost impossible to read his retelling of these nightmares without some feeling of encountering the new. No history book can ever truly be definitive, but this comes close. Roberts never loses sight of the human side of this epic.
    The Shreveport Times
    Roberts has produced a lucid narrative stream that makes his book flow like a novel. I couldn’t put it down.
    The New York Post
    Many World War II books require numerous volumes and thousands of pages. But by marching across huge spans of time and territory with the eye of a determined battlefield soldier, British historian Roberts packs the whole war into one 768-page volume.
    The Wall Street Journal
    Elegantly balances fact, thought and fresh, clear prose. . . . Roberts has set a high bar for future historians of mankind’s greatest bloodbath. . . . Roberts splendidly weaves a human tragedy into a story of war’s remorseless statistics.
    The Economist
    A magnificent book;It manages to be distinctive but not eccentric, comprehensive in scope but not cramped by detail, giving due weight both to the extraordinary personalities and to the blind economic and physical forces involved.
    Publishers Weekly
    This is history as it should be written. Award-winning historian Roberts, a master storyteller, combines a comprehensive command of sources, a sophisticated analytical dimension, and fingertip balance between great events and their personal dimensions. At the center of this "world-historical global cataclysm" was Adolf Hitler. Roberts presents the war as defined by Hitler's mistakes: "so heinous that he should have committed suicide out of sheer embarrassment...." Roberts (Masters and Commanders) says Hitler started the war before Germany was ready. He waged it with resources too limited for his grandiose objectives. He administered it through policies that made the Reich an enduring stench in the nostrils. Japan's war in the Pacific was no less ugly. Yet defeating the Axis required the strengths of three great powers. Roberts describes an Allied strategy shaped by the necessity of developing armed forces to match their foes. Britain kept the field in the war's darkest days. The U.S.S.R. drowned the Reich in "oceans of blood." America provided machines, money, and manpower—over 16 million in uniform. These synergized efforts were sufficient—barely sufficient, says Roberts. At every turn contingencies shaped outcomes that might have been very different absent the skill, will, and desperation demonstrated by the Grand Coalition. 4 pages of b&w photos; maps. (June)
    The Shreveport Times
    Roberts has produced a lucid narrative stream that makes his book flow like a novel. I couldn’t put it down.
    The Tucson Citizen
    Roberts underscores the factors that affected the war’s outcome and raises a number of intriguing questions. . . . Accessible, meticulously researched, and executed with clarity.
    The New York Post
    Many World War II books require numerous volumes and thousands of pages. But by marching across huge spans of time and territory with the eye of a determined battlefield soldier, British historian Roberts packs the whole war into one 768-page volume.
    From the Publisher
    "Roberts gives [listeners] a new, well-written retelling of the spectacular ebb and flow of World War II." —-Library Journal Starred Review
    Library Journal
    Roberts (Masters and Commanders: How Four Titans Won the War in the West, 1941–1945) gives readers a new, well-written retelling of the spectacular ebb and flow of World War II, mainly analyzing the European war, particularly German operations and Allied reactions. In some ways this is a psychological study of the various leaders. Roberts blames Hitler (rather than German army leaders) for the Axis defeat and argues that his obsessive Nazi ideology lead to disastrous military decisions. However, Roberts takes the German military leaders to task for not standing up to their pathological leader. Had Hitler let his generals do their job, the war would have lasted longer. Whether or not Germany could have won, it might have avoided total defeat. Roberts concludes that Britain, America, and the USSR needed one another to gain victory. A well-sourced and well-told introduction for general readers that will also be enjoyed by those in the know.

    Read More

    Sign In Create an Account
    Search Engine Error - Endeca File Not Found